What is a System One model?

The name borrows the fast, intuitive System 1 versus deliberate System 2 distinction popularized by Daniel Kahneman in Thinking, Fast and Slow. In software, this category covers models built to make constrained judgments: select a route, rate urgency or estimate whether a condition holds. Your application supplies the context and allowed answers, then uses the result to decide what happens next.

TypeSafe introduced Jev as a System One model in September 2026. The category has expanded rapidly: Cloudflare released Clef on October 1, and Liquid AI announced d1 with vision on October 5. Jev is one model in this category; other providers have different architectures, request contracts and limits. See the TypeSafe introduction, Cloudflare release and Liquid AI release.

Three question types

Choice, Score and Noul are the TypeSafe names for three useful decision shapes. Several providers implement them directly; other models need a runtime or adapter. Finite-answer output alone does not establish API compatibility.

TypeQuestionOutput and use
ChoiceWhich team should handle this refund request?Probabilities over your supplied options, such as billing 0.81 / technical 0.14 / retention 0.05. Use for routing and triage.
ScoreHow urgent is this request on our rubric?A probability-weighted position across ordered levels. With levels 0, 1, 2 and 3, a result might be 2.1; it is not automatically a 0–1 score.
NoulIs this message asking for a refund?A yes/no probability, such as 0.91 for yes. Set a threshold using labeled examples before taking action.

Examples are illustrative, not measured predictions. Contracts: TypeSafe question types.

What is noul in Jev? The yes/no question type explained · Using a decision model as a support-ticket classifier

Model comparison

This table covers 27 model, API and runtime entries, including the full supplied inventory. Rows marked Verification pending retain reported names while release identity or capabilities still need checking; their inclusion is not confirmation of availability. Supplied vendor attributions are marked separately when unverified. Yes means the linked vendor documentation exposes that named type. Runtime means the supplied local runtime provides it. Adapter means option selection needs application code to map it into that shape. Not documented or Not verified does not mean impossible. Scroll the table horizontally on smaller screens.

Model / sourceWho makes itChoiceScoreNoulCan you self-host?Price (USD)Site guides
Jev 1.13
Vendor source
TypeSafe AIYesYesYesHosted API; no public weights identified$0.042 / M input; output freeOverview · Noul · Classifier · Hosting · JSON · API · Pricing · Limitations · Examples · Jev vs LLM
Clef
Vendor source
CloudflareYesYesYesYes — open weights, Apache-2.0; also Workers AIWorkers AI: $0.24 / M input; local compute extraNo site guide yet
Clef-flash
Vendor source
CloudflareYesYesYesYes — open weights, Apache-2.0; also Workers AIWorkers AI: $0.09 / M input; local compute extraNo site guide yet
d1
Vendor source
Liquid AIYesYesYesHosted API; released weights not confirmed$0.04 / M input in vendor evaluation; confirm current API rateNo site guide yet
Solar Decide
Vendor source
UpstageYesYesYesHosted API, beta; released weights not confirmedInput rate not verified; output not billedNo site guide yet
Decider 1
Vendor source
meraGPTYesYesYesHosted API; released weights not confirmed$0.04 / M input; output not billedNo site guide yet
Tev1-4B experimental
Vendor source
Together AIAdapterNot documentedAdapterYes — open weights; check weight terms separately from MIT codeLocal compute; hosted rate not verifiedNo site guide yet
Bosun 3.1 1.7B
Vendor source
Hanno Labs / Clause Logic Inc.RuntimeRuntimeRuntimeYes — Apache-2.0 weights and Bosun runtimeLocal compute; no API rate verifiedNo site guide yet
Laya
Vendor source
Convai InnovationsRuntimeRuntimeRuntimeYes — Apache-2.0 weights and Laya runtimeLocal compute; no API rate verifiedNo site guide yet
Decisions API (Luna)
Vendor source
OpenAINot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedHosted API; announced in limited previewNot verifiedNo site guide yet
Respan Span-01
Verification pending
Source (details pending)
RespanNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNo site guide yet
CLM-8B
Verification pending
Source not verified
Stanford + NVIDIA Research
Supplied attribution; not verified
Not verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNo site guide yet
GLiNER2.5-Decide
Verification pending
Source not verified
Fastino
Supplied attribution; not verified
Not verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNo site guide yet
Xor 1.2
Vendor source
JuspayRuntimeRuntimeRuntimeYes — downloadable weights and local System One server; check release licenseLocal compute; hosted rate not verifiedNo site guide yet
JEV-27B
Vendor source
AutoTrust AIRuntimeRuntimeRuntimeYes — Apache-2.0 weights and local runtimeLocal compute; hosted rate not verifiedNo site guide yet
StartLux-Decision-4B
Vendor source
StartLux LabsRuntimeRuntimeRuntimeYes — CC BY-NC 4.0 weights; commercial use needs a separate licenseLocal compute; commercial license price not verifiedNo site guide yet
this-that-model 1.2
Vendor source
FLock.ioRuntimeRuntimeRuntimeYes — local runtime; repository license MITLocal compute; hosted rate not verifiedNo site guide yet
Jebadiah 27B
Vendor source
Frontier InfraRuntimeRuntimeRuntimeYes — Apache-2.0 weights and local runtimeLocal compute; hosted rate not verifiedNo site guide yet
JevEmbed
Vendor source
HITsz-TMG / HIT-TMGRuntimeRuntimeRuntimeYes — local embedding runtime; check the selected checkpoint licenseLocal compute; external embedding API charges depend on providerNo site guide yet
Intern-Decision-4B
Verification pending
Source not verified
InternLM
Supplied attribution; not verified
Not verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNo site guide yet
Metask-Jev-4B
Verification pending
Source (details pending)
Metask / metask-aiNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNo site guide yet
NeoHorse-Jev-4B
Vendor source
TokenRhythmRuntimeRuntimeRuntimeYes — Apache-2.0 weights and local decision engineLocal compute; hosted rate not verifiedNo site guide yet
Standard One 8B
Vendor source
Standard ThinkingRuntimeRuntimeRuntimeYes — Apache-2.0 weights and local System One serverLocal compute; hosted rate not verifiedNo site guide yet
Lumma-Fev-0.6B
Vendor source
FrontiersMindRuntimeRuntimeRuntimeYes — weights and local lumma-fev server; check checkpoint licenseLocal compute; hosted rate not verifiedNo site guide yet
Rune 26B-A4B
Vendor source
SurogateRuntimeRuntimeRuntimeYes — local deployment documented; confirm access and weight licenseLocal compute; hosted rate not verifiedNo site guide yet
SimpleJev
Verification pending
Source not verified
Featherless AI
Supplied attribution; not verified
Not verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNot verifiedNo site guide yet
djev
Vendor source
mmastrac (repository maintainer)RuntimeRuntimeRuntimeYes — runtime over DiffusionGemma; underlying weights have separate termsLocal compute; hosted rate not verifiedNo site guide yet

Reviewed 2026-10-06. Prices are per million input tokens where stated and are specific to the named provider. Downloadable weights still incur compute costs. An unknown price is not zero. Vendor-reported benchmark scores are not comparable across datasets; this table is not an accuracy ranking.

Entries with a checked primary source link to it. Source not verified means no primary source has been confirmed for that entry. Jev also links to its existing site guides. More model guides will be linked here as they are published.

Contract details worth checking

  • Tev1-4B experimental: Selects an option letter with logprobs. A binary choice can express yes/no, but is not a native Noul probability contract. Logprobs are not calibrated confidence.
  • Bosun 3.1 1.7B: The model card names this checkpoint 1.7B and reports 2,031,739,904 parameters for its pinned base. Typed answers require the Bosun runtime.
  • Laya: Several checkpoints exist. The vendor distinguishes base zero-shot results from tuned results; choose and evaluate the actual checkpoint.
  • Decisions API (Luna): OpenAI documents finite-answer decisions, but its announcement does not establish Jev question types or drop-in API compatibility.
  • GLiNER2.5-Decide: The supplied inventory attributes this to Fastino; a surfaced model card is under RedHatAI. Exact release identity and attribution remain unverified.
  • Xor 1.2: The model card identifies release/xor-1.2 separately from main. Pin the intended revision rather than assuming main is 1.2.
  • djev: This source describes a structured-decision runtime over DiffusionGemma, not separately trained weights. The supplied inventory names a different author; attribution to that author is not verified.

Choose by scenario

Choose a deployment path first, then compare the actual models on the same labeled requests.

Your requirementChooseWhy / next check
Try without an initial spendA hosted API with a verified trial allowanceStart with 20 real requests. Trial limits and eligibility differ by provider; this site offers Jev demo previews.
Data must stay on your infrastructureDownloadable weights with a local runtimeConsider Clef, Bosun or Laya. Check the actual serving path and license; a locally running SDK may still call a remote API.
Low latency on a CPUA small encoder-based model such as a Laya checkpointMeasure your hardware, sequence lengths and required fine-tuning. Parameter count alone does not prove latency.
A reason explaining each decisionThis category is not designed for written explanationsA probability is not a reason. Use a separate explanation stage grounded in the evidence, with human review where needed.

These are selection rules, not measured performance results. Self-hosted System One models: what actually runs locally.

Check System One model limitations and failure modes; the current guide documents Jev-specific issues, not universal failures of every model.

What independent evaluation shows

The September 29, 2026 preprint Evaluating and Benchmarking the System One Model Jev by Tobias Deußer, Lorenz Sparrenberg and Rafet Sifa evaluates Jev on 37 datasets. It reports strong results on several classification and reasoning datasets, with weaker performance on low-resource languages, fine-grained or noisy labels, and rubric judgments. It also finds that a fixed 0.5 binary threshold can be poorly placed: tuning on training data improves micro-F1 on UNFAIR-ToS from 0.50 to 0.75.

Those findings concern a specific Jev version and evaluation, not every System One model. Test your chosen model on a held-out set, tune thresholds separately, include out-of-scope inputs and compare a trained classifier when you already have labeled data. Keep accuracy, calibration, latency and total cost as separate measurements.

Guides and update policy

Last reviewed: . This edition lists 27 model, API and runtime entries; Clef and Clef-flash are separate rows. We retain reported candidates with explicit Verification pending labels, then verify each field against a vendor release, repository or model card. A pending row is a research lead, not a recommendation. This is not a claim of a complete census. New internal links need a published guide. Unverified rates and contracts remain explicitly marked.

Self-hosted System One models: what actually runs locally · Using a decision model as a support-ticket classifier · The JSON request and response format, explained · Jev API rates and VerdictKit playground plans · Try a decision model in the playground

Frequently asked questions

Is System One another name for Jev?

No. Jev is TypeSafe AI’s model. System One describes a category of bounded decision models, with different providers and implementations.

Does every model support Choice, Score and Noul?

No. Check the support columns and linked source. Some expose named typed questions; some require a runtime or adapter, and others have an unverified contract.

Can I self-host a System One model?

Some models release weights for local inference, including Clef, Bosun and Laya. Official Jev is hosted; a local SDK does not make its inference local.

Are open weights free to run?

You still pay for hardware or rented compute, operations and any required training. Weight and code licenses can differ.

Can I rank these models using vendor benchmark scores?

Only when the model versions, test data, splits and evaluation method match. Scores from different benchmarks do not form a reliable ranking.